<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Writer and Letter Writer David Infante	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://postscript.crane.com/david-infante-correspondence-fan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://postscript.crane.com/david-infante-correspondence-fan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=david-infante-correspondence-fan</link>
	<description>Crane Stationery Post Script</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeaneene Nooney		</title>
		<link>https://postscript.crane.com/david-infante-correspondence-fan/#comment-93638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeaneene Nooney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crane.com/?p=6138#comment-93638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since Duckduckgo couldn&#039;t load the online article by David Infante (I see this is from 2017!), there is no description or context to know why he was chosen as a subject for this forum.
So from the content it&#039;s hard to see that there is much to be gained from this.

I thought there might be some neat ideas for letter subjects or ways that letter writers might tap into a good response from a letter recipient.
Barring these things, it was interesting to see that Crane is, perhaps trying to appeal to a younger generation. Unfortunately, it would seem that is done by using expletives and communicating like a teenager. 
In the preface to this, while defining the origin of the word etiquette, (which was delightfully interesting) the concept itself was eschewed for being out of date, and anything-goes was the replacement. At least Infante cast a positive light on thank yous and how meaningful a letter can be to the one who receives it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Duckduckgo couldn&#8217;t load the online article by David Infante (I see this is from 2017!), there is no description or context to know why he was chosen as a subject for this forum.<br />
So from the content it&#8217;s hard to see that there is much to be gained from this.</p>
<p>I thought there might be some neat ideas for letter subjects or ways that letter writers might tap into a good response from a letter recipient.<br />
Barring these things, it was interesting to see that Crane is, perhaps trying to appeal to a younger generation. Unfortunately, it would seem that is done by using expletives and communicating like a teenager.<br />
In the preface to this, while defining the origin of the word etiquette, (which was delightfully interesting) the concept itself was eschewed for being out of date, and anything-goes was the replacement. At least Infante cast a positive light on thank yous and how meaningful a letter can be to the one who receives it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
